|
Investing in stocks can be a perilous exercise
as recent stock market events have shown. A successful investor
will choose each company that he takes a position in with
great care. As a minimum he should make an effort to receive
and understand the financial statements of the enterprise,
the nature of the business that he is investing in, and the
relative valuation of the company on the stock market. For
instance, as recent history has shown, even the shares of
well run companies in growing industries can fall precipitously
if valuations get too far out of line. In addition, even shares
of companies with prospects of solid growth can fall off a
cliff if the company is inadequately financed or stretches
its financial resources too far. The reason for this is that
markets are fickle, and projecting the future is at best an
educated guess. Companies that are inadequately financed may
not be around at the end of a downturn, and downturns always
come.
So how do you protect yourself with markets so volatile?
The answer is buying cheap stocks. Stocks that trade at reasonable
multiples, that are of financially solid companies with a
history of success, in industries where there is reasonable
comfort that even after a downturn there will be a return
to normalcy. It is impossible to protect against any loss,
but by adhering to the above rules, it is certainly possible
to mitigate any losses that might occur.
Below is a cursory overview of the issues to be considered
when contemplating an investment. The first rule of investing
is to know what you are investing in. No investment instrument
is just a piece of paper, it is a unit of ownership in an
institution. You must know how that unit of ownership is valued
and how viable the institution it represents is. The following
points will give you an idea of what to look for in an investment
opportunity.
What is a Share?
A share is a unit of ownership of a company. If a company
issues 100 shares then each share has a claim on 1/100th of
the net assets of the business. Net assets are the total assets
of the business (what it owns) minus the total liabilities
of the business (what it owes). Shareholders have a claim
on the companys assets after all other creditors have
been paid. They are the owners of the business and therefore
bare the risks of ownership. They have what is called a residual
interest in the business. That is why in the case of bankruptcy
shareholders generally get nothing, since nothing is left
after all other creditors have been paid.
Shares are often described as issued or outstanding. Shares
that are issued or outstanding are in the hands of shareholders.
Companies are often authorized to issue millions of shares
in excess of what are currently issued. If companies want
to raise extra capital down the road they may issue additional
shares. Shares that arent issued do not exist for all
intents and purposes and are not used in any of the calculations
discussed below.
Lets take the example of Joes garage.
Joes garage has $200 in assets and $100 in debts. It
has 100 shares outstanding.
The per-share value of Joes garage is therefore $1
((200-100)/100). That means, in theory at least, that each
share has a market value of one dollar.
Market Capitalization
When you hear announces or analysts talking about the total
market capitalization of a company, they are talking about
the total value of all shares outstanding. If a company has
1,000,000 shares outstanding at a market value of $50 per
share, then the market capitalization is 50,000,000.
You also here about small cap versus large cap stocks. This
has to do with a series of benchmarks that determine what
category a particular stock fits in. For instance, a small
cap company might have up to $100,000,000 of market value
and a large cap over a billion. Effectively the market capitalization
is the markets appraisal of the value of the total net
assets of the company.
How Shares are Valued - What is
Price Earnings Ratio?
The most common technique for valuing shares is using the
price earnings ratio. Price earnings ratio is the relationship
of the price that a share is trading at, to the per share
earnings of the company. Per share earnings are merely the
earnings of the company divided by the number of shares outstanding.
Lets have an example:
Lets say that Joes garage earned $500 for the
year. Lets further assume that he has one hundred shares
outstanding and that his shares are trading at $100 a piece.
His price earnings ration would be 20 or $100/$5 (Market value
per share divided by earnings per share). We could also say
that the stock trades at a multiple 20, that is, investors
are willing to pay 20 times earnings to acquire a share of
Joes stock.
The rate of return on Joes stock would be 5% or 5/100
(Earnings per share divided by market value per share). This
assumes that the earnings of the company will eventually be
converted to cash and distributed to the shareholders much
in the same way bond interest is paid to bondholders. Another
way of determining the multiple is 1/rate of return. In Joes
case 1 divided by 5% or twenty.
In setting a desired rate of return for a company several
issues have to be addressed,
|
1.
|
How risky is the business? What is the relationship
of its assets to its liabilities? Is it able to meet its
obligations as they become due? |
| |
|
|
2.
|
What is the projected growth rate of the
business? Obviously one would accept a lower return today
in exchange for a higher return tomorrow. |
| |
|
|
3.
|
How long has the company been in business,
and what is the likelihood that historical trends will
continue? |
| |
|
|
4.
|
What are the interest rates on risk free
investments? If government bonds are paying a guaranteed
5%, then obviously a premium would be required for shares
of stock. Returns on stock investments are generally far
less certain than those on bonds since bonds pay a fixed
rate of interest. |
Lets take a look at the market valuation of Moes
Pharmaceuticals
First, well assume that the rate of return on risk
free investments is 4%. Risk free investments would include
government bonds with ten to thirty year maturaties.
Moes Pharmaceutical is a rapidly growing company with
year over year earnings growth of 20%. The company earned
$2 per share in the prior year and currently trades at a multiple
of 20 or $40 (multiple x earnings per share). To earn a guaranteed
$2 with no risk would require an investment of $50 (Desired
return / risk free interest rate or 2/4%).
Bonds and money market investments, despite their guaranteed
returns, generally provide little if any growth. After twenty
years of getting 4% on your money you still have the same
$50 in principal (assuming that interest rates stayed the
same). You were guaranteed your 4% return per year but got
no appreciation in your capital.
To compare, lets assume that Moes growth rate
continues on at 20%. Lets also assume that the return
on risk free investments stays constant at 4%, and that Moes
shares continue to trade at a price earnings multiple of 20.
EPS (earnings per share) for the following five years are
as follows;
2000 $2.40
2001 $2.88
2002 $3.46
2003 $4.15
2004 $4.98
At the end of the fourth year the value of the stock is $4.98
x 20 or $99.6. We have heard a lot about how shares of stock
have historically had far greater rates of return than bonds
or bank interest. The above is a graphic example of why. The
monetary gain of buying shares of Moes pharmaceuticals
amounts to $59.6 ($99.6 - 50).
There are two points to keep in mind regarding the above.
1) The risk free return must stay low in order to maximize
the valuation on the shares. If for example, interest rates
crept up to 10% from the four percent that they were at when
the shares were purchased, the ensuing multiple would greatly
decline. In other words, if you can get 10% without any risk,
you would expect an even higher return if there were risk.
In our example the multiple might decline to 6.7 or 15% effective
return for an investment at the risk level of Moes.
The valuation in year four would therefore be $33.2 ($33.2
x 15% = 4.98/share).
2) Growth rates must be constant. Shares are valued based
on the expectation of future growth. If for whatever reason
growth rates slow down, the share valuations could decline
dramatically. That is because, in the absence of growth, the
market would require a much greater current return on investment.
In the case of Moes, if the market feared that the growth
rate might slow down, it might adjust the required return
to 6% from the current 5%. That would adjust the multiple
to 16.67 (1/6%) and the current valuation to $33.33 or $2
x 16.67.
One can see from the above that even slight differences in
the underlying assumptions regarding a stocks valuation
can have profound affects on its trading price. The greater
the price earnings ratio of a stock, the greater its reaction
to changes in either earnings expectations, or interest rate
variations.
What are Investment Fundamentals?
Fundamentals refer to the underlying factors governing a
stock price. Such things as rate and consistency of growth,
strength of the companys balance sheet, level of profitability,
and price earnings ratio all contribute to determining the
strengths of an investments fundamentals.
Consistency of Growth
As we mentioned previously, companys that have consistent
growth patterns tend be valued at higher multiples than those
that dont. Remember that stocks are valued based on
their projected stream of future earnings. Even though a company
may have very rosy earnings today, it may trade at a very
low multiple since its earnings are not expected to grow going
forward.
On the other hand, some companies that show insignificant
earnings currently are valued at astronomical multiples since
investors feel that earnings will mushroom in the future.
If one anticipates compound growth rates of 50% as with some
internet stocks, the current earnings appear to bare little
relationship to the market price of a share.
Strength of Balance Sheet
This is a key factor in assessing the risk of an investment
and therefore its price earnings multiple. If a company has
a very solid balance sheet, that is its assets are far greater
than its liabilities, then it is considered more able to weather
economic downturns or take advantages of opportunities that
come up in the market place.
The debt to equity ratio provides information on the relationship
between the amount of companys financing that is generated
from debt versus internal sources. Internal sources include
income retained in the business and not distributed to shareholders,
and funds contributed by company owners, normally through
the issuance of capital stock. These are referred to as the
equity or the owners interest in the company. The greater
the ratio of equity financing a company has, the more stable
and financially sound it is considered. A company with a debt
to equity ratio of one to one or better, is generally considered
very solid. This means that for every dollar a company has
borrowed, another dollar was provided by either the sale of
shares or retention of corporate earnings.
The current ratio is another measure that is considered.
It measures the relationship between debts due within one
year and assets that will be converted to cash within one
year. It is a short-term measure of liquidity, which measures
the ability of the company to pay its creditors in the short
term.
Level of Profitability
The level of a companys profitability is the amount
of money a company makes from selling its product or providing
its service. It is closely related to return on investment
which is the amount of income a company generates from each
dollar of invested capital. If a company competes in a growing
market, has a recognizable brand name that guarantees it consistent
market share, and has its costs well under control, it becomes
an attractive investment.
Companies that have an established franchise, such as Intel,
where consumers are willing to pay a premium to acquire their
product are in a very enviable position. They have latitude
in passing price increases on to customers thereby protecting
their margins, and their financial strength can assure that
they have considerable clout with suppliers. Such factors
make a company a significant long-term player, and contribute
to its ability to grow its earnings.
Discount or Premium to Book
When balance sheets are prepared they are prepared on a historical
cost basis. What this means is that the assets are valued
at their initial purchase price unless there is evidence of
a permanent decline in which case they are written down to
current market value. Financial statements are prepared very
conservatively, often reflecting values for assets acquired
years past. In addition, balance sheets rarely reflect the
goodwill of a company. Unless goodwill is actually acquired
when an affiliate or subsidiary is purchased it is not reflected
on the balance sheet. Goodwill is the value of the companys
name, its franchise, or its ability to earn income. Most companies
are worth more than the sum of their parts particularly if
they are highly profitable. Goodwill is the difference between
the sum of the parts and the going concern value of the company.
If a company sells at a discount to book, we mean that the
book value, as disclosed on the companys balance sheet,
divided by the number of shares outstanding, is greater than
the market value of the individual shares. This implies negative
goodwill, or the fact that the company is worth less as a
going concern - unusual in all but the most extreme circumstances.
Clearly any company that trades at a discount to book would
be considered less risky. At a minimum it could be a takeover
target for other more profitable companies in the same industry.
On the other hand, the forces that would push a company to
trade at a discount to book may also prohibit it from generating
any compelling returns in the near term. This type of situation
normally requires a long- term horizon.
Price Earnings Ratio
The price earnings ratio is really a composite of the above
points. It is determined by the financial strength of a company,
how consistently it has grown its earnings, the strength
of its balance sheet and its level of profitability.
But price earnings ratio is more than the sum of these four.
Very often even the best companies can trade at ratios that
are astronomical. A company can have wonderful fundamentals
but the market price of the stock is so high, that every favorable
variable combined cannot support it. Some internet stocks,
despite having otherwise sound fundamentals, trade at price
earnings multiples that anticipate future results that are
virtually unattainable. The stock no longer represents value
but becomes more of a work of art, reflecting a desire for
ownership rather than any consideration of what the company
might be worth. These are situations to avoid. If simple rule
of thumb valuation techniques are used, most investors can
steer themselves clear of them.
If the risk free return is around five percent, then a multiple
of greater than 80 is clearly dangerous. Lets look at
an example. Lets say a company earned one dollar per
share and traded at a multiple of 80. Lets further assume
that earnings are expected to grow 33% per year indefinitely
(a tall order for any company)
Assuming five years of growth at 33%
2000 1.33
2001 1.77
2002 2.35
2003 3.12
2004 4.14
It would take five years to get back to the level of earnings
that you could get on a risk free investment presently. Of
course this assumes that the company grows at 33% per year
which is not easy for any company. What happens if the economy
has a downturn and earnings fail to measure up? What happens
if interest rates creep up and the multiple declines? Eighty
is a very high multiple to sustain and assumes a very low
level of inflation, steady astronomical growth in earnings,
and a market that is expanding without inflationary pressure.
One can can see how any one of a number of factors can derail
an investment.
Conclusion
The above is a very cursory view of some of the issues involved
in evaluating investments. I hope it has been helpful.
|